نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه مهندسی بهداشت محیط، دانشکده علوم پزشکی و خدمات بهداشتی درمانی ساوه، ساوه، ایران

2 دکتری مهندسی بهداشت محیط، رئیس گروه بهداشت ایمنی و محیط‌زیست، شرکت آب و فاضلاب استان کرمانشاه، کرمانشاه، ایران،

3 کارشناس ارشد مهندسی بهداشت محیط، کارشناس مراقب سلامت، اداره کل آموزش‌وپرورش استان تهران، تهران، ایران.

4 کارشناس بهداشت محیط، کمیته تحقیقات دانشجویی، دانشکده علوم پزشکی و خدمات بهداشتی درمانی ساوه، ساوه، ایران.

چکیده

 
زمینه و هدف: شهرک صنعتی کاوه با وسعت ۳۰۰۰ هکتار در نزدیکی ساوه، دارای ناحیه مسکونی با بیش از ۲۵۰۰ نفر جمعیت است که در مجاورت صنایع فعال شبانه‌روزی قرار دارد. این همجواری، ضرورت ارزیابی و پهنه‌بندی آلودگی صوتی را برای آگاهی از سطح مواجهه و حمایت از مدیریت شهری ایجاد می‌کند. این مطالعه باهدف سنجش و تحلیل مکانی آلودگی صوتی در زمستان ۱۴۰۳ انجام شد.
مواد و روش­ها: پژوهش بر اساس استاندارد ISO 1996-1:2016 و پس از پیش مطالعه طراحی گردید. ۴۹ نقطه برای اندازه‌گیری تراز صوت انتخاب شد. در هر ایستگاه، تراز معادل پیوسته (Leq) با صداسنج TES-1358 ثبت و داده‌ها با نرم‌افزار Excel و ArcGIS Pro تحلیل گردید.
یافته­ها: تحلیل مکانی نشان داد در روز ۸۸ درصد از مساحت ناحیه مسکونی در معرض تراز بالاتر از ۶۵ dB(A) و در شب ۹۶ درصد بالاتر از ۵۵ dB(A) قرار داشت. میانگین شاخص DNL برابر ۷۱ دسی‌بل محاسبه شد. تنها بخش کوچکی دارای شدت صدای کمتر از ۴۵ dB(A) در شب بود که با حدود مجاز تطابق داشت.
نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج بیانگر آن است که ناحیه مسکونی مجاور شهرک صنعتی کاوه در اغلب نقاط در معرض سطوحی فراتر از استانداردها قرار دارد، به‌ویژه در شب که بسیاری از نواحی بیش از ۶۵ dB(A) را تجربه می‌کنند. توزیع نامتوازن شدت صوت نشان‌دهنده نقش منابع محلی و نبود موانع صوتی مؤثر است. یافته‌ها لزوم بازنگری زیست‌محیطی شهرک‌های صنعتی و اجرای اقدامات کنترلی همچون دیوار صوتی، کمربند سبز، محدودیت فعالیت شبانه و پایش مستمر را نشان می‌دهد.

تازه های تحقیق

https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=uiernvoAAAAJ

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/myncbi/reza.nemati.2/bibliography/public/

https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=Nc_v3SsAAAAJ

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/myncbi/mokhtar.mahdavi.1/bibliography/public/

https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=_ZkmymoAAAAJ

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/myncbi/narges.hakimi.1/bibliography/public/

https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=giEz_tAAAAAJ

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/myncbi/nahid.rashidi.1/bibliography/public/

https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=qsmkQQ8AAAAJ

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/myncbi/ali.vahedi%20gandomani.1/bibliography/public/

 

 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Spatial Analysis and Risk-Based Zoning of Industrial Noise Exposure in Residential Areas Adjacent to the Kaveh Industrial Complex Using GIS, Saveh, Iran (2025)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Reza Nemati 1
  • Mokhtar Mahdavi 2
  • Narges Hakimi 3
  • Nahid Rashidi 4
  • Ali Vahedi Gandomani 4

1 Assistant professor of Environmental Health Engineering, Department of Environmental Health, Saveh University of Medical Sciences, Saveh, Iran.

2 Ph.D of Environmental Health Engineering, Head of Health Safety and Environment (HSE) Department, Kermanshah Water and Wastewater Company, Kermanshah, Iran

3 M.Sc. in Environmental Health Engineering, Health Officer, Tehran Provincial Office of Education, Ministry of Education, Tehran, Iran.

4 B.Sc in Environmental Health Engineering, Student Research Committee, Saveh University of Medical Sciences, Saveh, Iran,

چکیده [English]

Introduction: The Kaveh Industrial Estate spans 3,000 hectares near Saveh and operates continuously. A residential area housing over 2,500 inhabitants is situated directly adjacent to it. Assessing and mapping environmental noise exposure is critical for understanding exposure levels and supporting urban planning and environmental management. This study aimed to evaluate and spatially analyze noise pollution in the adjacent residential zone during the fall and winter of 2024–2025.
Materials and Methods: Following a preliminary assessment based on ISO 1996-1:2016 guidelines, 49 measurement locations were selected. The equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure level (Leq) was measured at each site using a TES-1358 sound level meter. Data were processed in Excel and analyzed spatially using ArcGIS Pro.
Results: Spatial analysis revealed that 88% of the residential area exceeded 65 dB during the day, and 96% exceeded 55 dB at night. The mean Day-Night Sound Level (DNL) was 71 dB. Only a minimal portion of the area exhibited nighttime levels near or below the 45 dB permissible limit.
Conclusion: The findings indicate that the residential area adjacent to Kaveh Industrial Estate is exposed to noise levels exceeding standard limits in most locations, particularly at night when sound levels in many zones surpassed 65 dB. The uneven spatial distribution of noise indicates the influence of local sources and a lack of effective sound barriers. These results underscore the need for environmental reconsideration of industrial areas and the implementation of control measures such as noise walls, green buffers, nighttime operation limits, and continuous monitoring.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Spatial Analysis
  • Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
  • Industrial Noise Pollution
  • Risk Zoning
  • Residential Area
  • Kaveh Industrial Estate
  • Saveh
  1. Dreger S, Schüle SA, Hilz LK, Bolte G. Social Inequalities in Environmental Noise Exposure: A Review of Evidence in the WHO European Region. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(6).DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16061011.
  2. Akande OK, Yusuf A. Environmental Noise in Residential Environments: The Case for Quality of Life in Minna, Nigeria. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal. 2022;7(22):117-25.DOI:https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v7i22.4161
  3. Daniel E. Noise and Hearing Loss: A Review. Journal of School Health. 2007;77(5):225-31.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00197.x
  4. Lutman ME. What is the risk of noise-induced hearing loss at 80, 85, 90 dB(A) and above? Occup Med (Lond). 2000;50(4):274-5.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/50.4.274
  5. Yun I, Lee SH, Park S, Jang S-Y, Jang S-I. Depressive symptoms of people living in areas with high exposure to environmental noise: a multilevel analysis. Scientific Reports. 2024;14(1):14450.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65497-0
  6. Basner M, Babisch W, Davis A, Brink M, Clark C, Janssen S, Stansfeld S. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. The lancet. 2014;383(9925):1325-32.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61613-x
  7. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Environmental noise guidelines for the European Region. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe; 2018.https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/279952
  8. Abbaspour M, Karimi E, Nassiri P, Monazzam MR, Taghavi L. Hierarchal assessment of noise pollution in urban areas–A case study. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2015;34:95-103.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.10.002
  9. Rahmati S, Sadeghi S, Moosazadeh M. Oxidative stress markers in occupational noise exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2025;98(2):155-67.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-025-02131-0
  10. Emamjomeh M.M. NA, Safari Variani A. Study of noise pollution in Qazvin. Journal of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences. 2011;15(1):63-70, URL: https://brieflands.com/articles/jid-155584
  11. Adl M, Mahmoudi L, Azizi S, Taherianfar A. Analysis and evaluation of noise pollution in Karaj city. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2022;24(10):133-44.DOI:https://doi.org/10.30495/jest.2022.64103.5555
  12. Fathi S, Nassiri P, Monazzam-Esmaeil-Pour M, Mansouri N, Razzaghi-Borkhani F. Study of Noise Pollution in the District 5 of Tehran Municipally. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology[Internet] 2015;65(2):1-7[in Persian] URL: https://srb.sanad.iau.ir/en/Article/838874
  13. Esmeray E, Eren S. GIS-based mapping and assessment of noise pollution in Safranbolu, Karabuk, Turkey. Environment, development and sustainability. 2021;23:15413-31.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01303-5
  14. Wawa EA, Mulaku GC. Noise pollution mapping using GIS in Nairobi, Kenya. Journal of Geographic Information System. 2015;7(05):486.DOI:https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2015.75039
  15. Casas WJP, Cordeiro EP, Mello TC, Zannin PHT. Noise mapping as a tool for controlling industrial noise pollution. Journal of scientific & industrial research [recurso eletrônico] New Delhi 2014;73(4):262-6 URL:http://hdl.handle.net/10183/111669
  16. ISO 1996-1, 2003. Acoustics — Description, Measurement and Assessment of Environmental Noise. Part 1: Basis Quantities and Assessment Procedures. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.URL:https://www.iso.org/standard/59765.html.
  17. Stelzer EM, Kopald H, Stanley RM, Gawron V. Supporting The Development Of Empirically Driven Human Systems Integration Guidelines For System Requirements. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 2015;59(1):36-40.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931215591008
  18. Nassiri P, Karimi E, Monazzam MR, Abbaspour M, Taghavi L. Analytical comparison of traffic noise indices—A case study in District 14 of Tehran City. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control. 2016;35(3):221-9.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/026309231666091
  19. Romeu J, Genescà M, Pàmies T, Jiménez S. Street categorization for the estimation of day levels using short-term measurements. Applied Acoustics. 2011;72(8):569-77.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2010.09.012
  20. Ouis D. Annoyance from road traffic noise: a review. Journal of environmental psychology. 2001;21(1):101-20.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2000.0187
  21. Li J, Heap AD. A review of comparative studies of spatial interpolation methods in environmental sciences: Performance and impact factors. Ecological Informatics. 2011;6(3):228-41.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2010.12.003
  22. Harman BI, Koseoglu H, Yigit CO. Performance evaluation of IDW, Kriging and multiquadric interpolation methods in producing noise mapping: A case study at the city of Isparta, Turkey. Applied Acoustics. 2016;112:147-57.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.05.024
  23. Robinson TP, Metternicht G. Testing the performance of spatial interpolation techniques for mapping soil properties. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2006;50(2):97-108.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2005.07.003