نوع مقاله : مروری

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری گروه مدیریت خدمات بهداشتی و درمانی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار گروه مدیریت خدمات بهداشتی و درمانی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

3 استادیار گروه مدیریت خدمات بهداشتی و درمانی ،واحدعلوم وتحقیقات،دانشگاه آزاداسلامی ،تهران،ایران.

چکیده

زمینه و هدف: بومی‌سازی تجربه کشورهای منتخب، منجر به تقویت حاکمیت نظام سلامت کشور خواهد شد که زمینه را برای اهداف پایدار نظام سلامت فراهم می‌کند. این مطالعه با هدف مقایسه عملکرد نظام سلامت کشورهای موفق به‌منظور ارائه الگوی مناسب برای عملکرد نظام سلامت ایران انجام شد.
مواد و روش­ها: روش پژوهش در این مطالعه از نوع توصیفی، تطبیقی و موردی بود. گردآوری داده‌ها بر اساس روش جستجوی کتابخانه‌ای انجام شد. بدین منظور از کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مرتبط با حاکمیت نظام سلامت و معادل انگلیسی آنها استفاده شد. مقالات به‌روز در پایگاه‌های اطلاعاتی معتبر داخلی و خارجی مورد استفاده قرار گرفت.
یافته­ها: یافته‌ها نشان داد از حیث ساختار سلامت، کشورهای ایران و چین وزارت بهداشت دارند که مسئولیت نظام سلامت را به‌عهده دارد. در ساختار نظام سلامت ایران و ترکیه، کنترل و اعتبارسنجی به‌صورت مستمر می‌باشد و رفع موانع در این کشورها براساس کنترل مبتنی بر شواهد است که بر این اساس پاسخگویی اجتماعی صورت می‌گیرد. مسئولیت‌های وزارت بهداشت در ایران بسیار زیاد است. بررسی شاخص‌های کنترل به‌صورت کمی و کیفی نشان می‌دهد که تمامی کشورها به‌منظور ارتقای کیفیت و اثربخشی خدمات به فناوری اطلاعات توجه ویژه‌ای دارند
نتیجه‌گیری: نظام سلامت ایران با معضلاتی مواجه است از این‌رو رفع موانع براساس پاسخگویی اجتماعی و توجه به فناوری اطلاعات و همچنین کاهش تعداد مسئولیت‌های وزارت بهداشت می‌تواند در ارتقای کیفیت و اثربخشی خدمات مؤثر باشد.

تازه های تحقیق

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=fa&as_sdt

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=zeynab+sedighi+somye+kochak

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=fa&as_sdt=0,5&q

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Kamrane+haji+nabi

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=fa&as_sdt=0,5&q

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Anise+nik+ravan

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=leila+nazani+manesh

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=leila+nazani+manesh

 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparing Health System Performance of Selected Countries in Order to Provide a Suitable Model for Control Management of Health Services in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zeynab Sedighi Someye Kochak 1
  • Kamran Hajnabi 2
  • Leila Nazarimanesh 3
  • Aniseh Nikravan 3

1 Doctoral student,.Department Of Health Services Management، ,SR.C.، Islamic Azad Universit,y، Teheran، Iran.

2 Assistant Professor Department Of Health Services Management، ,SR.C.، Islamic Azad Universit,y، Teheran,Iran.

3 Assistant Professor Department Of Health Services Management، ,SR.C.، Islamic Azad Universit,y، Teheran، Iran.

چکیده [English]

Introduction: Health system policymakers can enhance the performance of healthcare systems by strengthening governance. This study aims to compare the performance of healthcare systems in successful countries to provide a suitable model for improving Iran's health system.
Materials and Methods: This research employed a comparative study design. To gather relevant information, Persian keywords related to health system governance, along with their English equivalents (e.g., organizational structure, evaluation, stewardship, planning, accreditation), were utilized. Updated articles were sourced from databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, Magiran, Elsevier, PubMed, SID, Medline, Iranmedex, as well as Google Scholar and search engines.
Results: The findings revealed that countries like Iran and China have ministries of health responsible for overseeing their health systems, while countries like the United States operate a national public health system. Continuous control and validation processes are implemented in both Iran and Turkey. Most countries examine quantitative and qualitative control indicators to ensure health system performance. Furthermore, all countries have emphasized the importance of information technology to enhance the quality and effectiveness of healthcare services.
Conclusion: Iran's health system faces numerous challenges. Adapting the experiences of successful countries can strengthen the governance of Iran's health system, laying the groundwork for achieving sustainable healthcare goals.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Control management
  • control
  • performance management
  • nurse
  • hospital :
  1. AM M. Essentials of healthcare organization and management, Tehran: Dibagran Tehran; . [Persian]. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511762246.036 
  2. The World health report 2000: Health systems: improving performance. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. 2000.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0033-3549(04)50043-2 
  3. Everybody’s business: strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes: WHO’s framework for action. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2007.
  1. https://doi.org/10.26719/2015.21.6.379 
  1. B B. Health law's kaleidoscope: Health law rights in a global age: Routledge. 2017.
  1. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315253527-15 
  1. Damari B VM, ROSTAMI GN, Kabir MJ. Evaluation of the urban family physician and referral system program in Fars and Mazandran provinces: history, achievements, challenges and solutions. 2016.
  1. https://doi.org/10.18502/mshsj.v4i2.1410 
  1. Mosadeghrad AM A-sA, T Y. Evaluation of hospital accreditation method. [Persian]. Tehran Univ Med J. 2017;75(4):288-98. https://doi.org/10.18502/mshsj.v4i2.1410 
  2. Mehr Al-Hosni Mohammad Hossein YFV, Orumieh A. Nadia, Saif Eldini Rostam, Mirzaei Saeed. A comparative study of the health systems of liberal, social and mixed countries based on the framework of layered analysis of causes. Iranian Journal of Epidemiology. 2016;13(5):14-26.
  1. https://doi.org/10.4314/jfas.v8i3s.261 
  1. Mosadeghrad AM, Rahimi-Tabar P. Health system governance in Iran: A comparative study %J Razi Journal of Medical Sciences. 2019;26(9):10-28.
  1. https://doi.org/10.18502/mshsj.v4i2.1410 
  1. Farahbod M, Masoudi Asl I, Tabibi SJ, Kamali M. Comparing the Rehabilitation Structures in the Health Systems of Iran, Germany, Japan, Canada, Turkey, and South Africa. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2023;24(1):96-113.
  1. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_211_18 
  1. kazeminia M, Khatony A, jafari f. Assessing Good Governance in the Dimensions of Quality, Effectiveness and Accountability in the Health System of Iran and Selected Countries: A Comparative Study %J Journal of healthcare management. 2022;12(4):7-18. https://doi.org/10.51866/oa1308 
  2. Iravani M, Riahi L, Abdi K, Tabibi SJ. A Comparative Study of the Rehabilitation Services Systems for People With Disabilities. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2021;21(4):544-63. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v49i11.4732 
  3. Daneshkohan Abbas BA, Zohoor Alireza, Ebadi Fard Azar Farbod Comparative Study of Health System Management Development
  4. Assessment Models in Selected Countries. Health Information Management. 2011;8(2):1-12 .https://doi.org/10.19082/4225 
  5. R B. Health systems: Finding New Strengths. In: WHO, Editor. The world Health Report 2004. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2004: 57-69. https://doi.org/10.15406/ijfcm.2017.01.00001 
  6. G B. Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection. About the Healthcare Commission. London: Healthcare Commission; 2005. 1-10 p. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2010.16.9.78374 
  7. S Y. Performance assessment of medical universities in supportive activities area, Journal of Management Development. Tehran: Iran Ministry of health and medical education; 2005. 9-14 p. https://doi.org/10.3329/seajph.v6i1.30336 
  8. Organization WH. World Health Organization’s Ranking of the World’s Health Systems [Internet]. . 2000. https://doi.org/10.51866/oa1308 
  9. Davis K SK, Squires D, Schoen C. Mirror, mirror on the wall How the performance of the US Health care system compares internationally. New York 2014. https://doi.org/10.15406/ijfcm.2017.01.00001 
  10. R W. Comparing federal systems. 3rd ed. Gagnon A-G, Soeren K, editors. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press for the Institute of Intergovernmental Relations. 2008 https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.20540/v1 
  11. CH T. Single payers, multiple systems: the scope and limits of subnational variation under a federal health policy framework. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2009; 34: 453–96. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-2009-011 
  12. Thomson S OR, Squires D, Reed SJ. International profiles of health care systems 2011: Australia, Canada, Denmark, England, France, Germany, Iceland, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States. New York: Commonwealth Fund. 2011 .https://doi.org/10.1017/s002078290004064x 
  13. de Cos PH M-BE. Determinants of health-system efficiency: evidence from OECD countries. . Int J Health Care Finance Econ [Internet]. 2014;14: 69–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-013-9140-7 
  14. Gutiérrez SMB MT, Rakue Y. Comparison of four health systems: Cuba, China, Japan and the USA, an approach to reality. southeast asian j trop med public Heal. 2003. https://doi.org/10.4103/1755-6783.222648 
  15. M S. On the concept of a socialist health system: a question of marxist epistemology. Int J Heal Serv. 1983;13:221–5 https://doi.org/10.2190/l747-35wt-bpxk-1ndu 
  16. M D. Income-related inequalities and inequities in health care services utilisation in 18 selected OECD countries. Eur J Heal Econ [Internet]. 2015;16: 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-013-0546-4 
  17. O K. Social class, sector employment, and gender as party cleavages in the Scandinavian countries: A comparative longitudinal study, 1970–95. Scan Polit Stud. 2001;24:311–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.00058 
  18. Anell A GA, Merkur S. Health Systems in Transition - Sweden Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2012;14:187. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108855464.005 
  19. MW D. Ways of war and peace realism, liberalism, and socialism. Norton; . 1998. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585493 
  20. D C. Income inequality, social cohesion and the health status of populations: teh role of neo-liberalism. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:135–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00445-1 
  21. JE L. Socialism versus liberalism: globalization's impact on the social and business systems in France. Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198208525.003.0005 
  22. Smith PC AA, Busse R, Crivelli L, Lindahl AK, Westert G, et al. Leadership and governance in seven developed health systems. Health Policy. 2012;106:37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.12.009 
  23. World health statistics 2016: Monitoring health for sustainable development goals. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; . 2016. https://doi.org/10.1037/e400972004-001