مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی سبزوار

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اخبار و اعلانات

فرم های ضروری نشریه

راهنمای تنظیم مقاله

تحلیل تشخیصی شدت مصرف کانابیس بر اساس سبک دلبستگی، نشخوار خشم، حمایت اجتماعی ادراک شده و رضایت از زندگی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد، گروه روان‌شناسی بالینی، دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه سمنان، مهدیشهر، سمنان، ایران

2 کارشناسی ارشد، گروه روان‌شناسی بالینی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه سمنان، مهدیشهر، سمنان، ایران

3 استادیار، گروه علوم شناختی، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران

10.30468/jsums.2024.7708.3015

چکیده

زمینه و هدف: کانابیس پرمصرف‌ترین ماده مخدر در سطح جهان است. هدف پژوهش حاضر، تحلیل تمیز شدت مصرف کانابیس بر اساس سبک دلبستگی، نشخوار خشم، حمایت اجتماعی ادراک‌شده و رضایت از زندگی بود.
مواد و روش­ها: مطالعه حاضر، توصیفی و از نوع علی- مقایسه‌ای بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل تمامی افراد مصرف‌کننده کانابیس در سطح شهر اراک بودند. تعداد 90 نفر با روش نمونه‌گیری گلوله‌برفی انتخاب شدند. داده‌ها به‌وسیله آزمون غربالگری درگیری با الکل، سیگار و مواد (هومنیوک و همکاران، 2008)، مقیاس دلبستگی بزرگسال (بشارت، 2011)، مقیاس نشخوار خشم (ساخودولسکی و همکاران، 2001)، مقیاس حمایت اجتماعی ادراک‌شده (زیمت و همکاران، 1988) و مقیاس رضایت از زندگی (داینر و همکاران، 1985)، گردآوری شدند. تحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از روش تحلیل تشخیصی و نرم‌افزار spss-26 انجام شد.
یافته­ها: نتایج تحلیل تشخیصی نشان داد که هر سه بعد متغیر سبک دلبستگی، نمره کل متغیر نشخوار خشم، مؤلفه‌های خانواده و دوستان متغیر حمایت اجتماعی ادراک‌شده و همچنین نمره کل این مقیاس و متغیر رضایت از زندگی در بین گروه‌های موردبررسی، تفاوت معناداری نشان دادند.
نتیجه‌گیری: با درنظرگرفتن توانایی افتراق متغیرهای پژوهش می‌توان از آن‌ها برای تشخیص افتراقی شدت مصرف کانابیس در سه گروه کم‌خطر، خطر متوسط و پرخطر استفاده کرد.

تازه های تحقیق

https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=tCQ94BUAAAAJ&hl=en&authuser=4

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/myncbi/reza.asadi.5/bibliography/public/

https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=9u-wKrsAAAAJ&hl=en&authuser=1

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/myncbi/fatemeh.azizi%20ganjehei.1/bibliography/public/

https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=JkfjOzgAAAAJ

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/myncbi/seyed%20mosa.tabatabaee.1/bibliography/public/

 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Discriminant Analysis of Cannabis Use Severity Based on Attachment Style, Anger Rumination, Perceived Social Support, and Life Satisfaction

نویسندگان [English]

  • Reza Asadi 1
  • Fatemeh Azizi Ganjehei 2
  • Seyed Mosa Tabatabaee 3

1 MSc, Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Semnan University, Mahdishahr, Semnan, Iran

2 MSc, Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Semnan University, Mahdishahr, Semnan, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Cognitive Sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction: Cannabis is the most widely used drug in the world. The present study aimed to analyze the discriminant of cannabis use intensity based on attachment style, anger rumination, perceived social support, and life satisfaction.
Materials and Methods: The present study was descriptive and causal-comparative. The statistical population of the research included all cannabis users in the city of Arak. 90 people were selected by snowball sampling method. The data were collected from the Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (Hominiuk et al., 2008), the Adult Attachment Inventory (Bashart, 2011), the Anger Rumination Scale (Sukhodolsky et al., 2001), the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (Zimet et al., 1988) and Satisfaction With Life Scale (Diener et al., 1985). Data analysis was done using the discriminant analysis method and SPSS-26 software.
Results: The results of the discriminant analysis showed that all three dimensions of the attachment style variable, the total score of anger rumination variable, family and friends components of the perceived social support variable, as well as the total score of this scale and the variable of life satisfaction, showed significant differences between the studied groups.
Conclusion: Considering the ability to differentiate research variables, they can be used to differentiate the intensity of cannabis use into three groups: lower risk, medium risk, and high risk.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Cannabis
  • Perceived Social Support
  • Life Satisfaction
  • Attachment Style
  • Anger Rumination
مراجع
  1. LeNoue SR, Riggs PD. Substance abuse prevention. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics. 2016 Apr 1;25(2):297-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2015.11.007
  2. Bari A, DiCesare J, Babayan D, Runcie M, Sparks H, Wilson B. Neuromodulation for substance addiction in human subjects: a review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2018 Dec 1;95:33-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.09.013
  3. Poznyak V, Rekve D. Global status report on alcohol and health 2018. World Health Organization. 2018 Sep 18;450.
  4. Boland R, Verdiun M, Ruiz P. Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2021 Feb 9.
  5. Bussink C, Carpentier C, Davalos LM, Davis P, Duran-Martinez A, Eichinger N, Flanders J, Korenblik A, Laenen FV, Lemohieu JL, Levissianos S. United Nations office on drugs and crime, World Drug Report. New York. 2016.
  6. Anderson-Carpenter KD, Fletcher JB, Swendeman D, Reback CJ. Associations between sociodemographic characteristics and substance use disorder severity among methamphetamine-using men who have sex with men. Substance use & misuse. 2019 Sep 19;54(11):1763-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2019.1610445
  7. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Drug market trends of Cannabis and Opioids .2022. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/wdr-2022_booklet-3.html
  8. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787
  9. Fernandez E, Scott S. Anger treatment in chemically-dependent inpatients: Evaluation of phase effects and gender. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy. 2009 Jul;37(4):431-47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465809990075
  10. Novaco R, Ramm M, Black L, Hollin C. Handbook of offender assessment and treatment. 2001.
  11. Anestis MD, Anestis JC, Selby EA, Joiner TE. Anger rumination across forms of aggression. Personality and Individual Differences. 2009 Jan 1;46(2):192-6. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.026
  12. Lievaart M, Huijding J, van der Veen FM, Hovens JE, Franken IH. The impact of angry rumination on anger-primed cognitive control. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 2017 Mar 1;54:135-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.07.016
  13. Horváth Z, Kökönyei G, Sárosi P, Koós M, Demetrovics Z, Urbán R. The mediating effect of anger rumination, coping and conformity motives on the association between hostility and problematic cannabis use. Addictive behaviors reports. 2022 Dec 1;16:100447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2022.100447
  14. Sukhodolsky DG, Golub A, Cromwell EN. Development and validation of the anger rumination scale. Personality and individual differences. 2001 Oct 1;31(5):689-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00171-9
  15. Flores PJ. Addiction as an attachment disorder. Jason Aronson; 2004.
  16. Duschinsky R. The emergence of the disorganized/disoriented (D) attachment classification, 1979–1982. History of psychology. 2015 Feb;18(1):32. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038524
  17. Ainsworth MD, Blehar MC, Waters E, Wall SN. Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Psychology Press; 2015 Jun 26. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203758045
  18. Fairbairn CE, Briley DA, Kang D, Fraley RC, Hankin BL, Ariss T. A meta-analysis of longitudinal associations between substance use and interpersonal attachment security. Psychological bulletin. 2018 May;144(5):532. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000141
  19. Owuor HA, Karega M. Relationship between attachment styles and risk for problematic drug use among undergraduate students in selected universities In Kenya. Prevalence of Substance Abuse among Students in Medical Training Colleges in South Nyanza Region, Kenya. 2020:20.
  20. Schindler A. Attachment and substance use disorders—theoretical models, empirical evidence, and implications for treatment. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2019 Oct 15;10:727. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00727
  21. Cömert IT, Ögel Attachment styles of adolescent substance users. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions. 2014;1(1):26-40. https://doi.org/10.15805/addicta.2014.1.1.001
  22. Rapier R, McKernan S, Stauffer CS. An inverse relationship between perceived social support and substance use frequency in socially stigmatized populations. Addictive behaviors reports. 2019 Dec 1;10:100188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2019.100188
  23. Barrera Jr M. Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models. American journal of community psychology. 1986 Aug;14(4):413-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00922627
  24. Lakey B, Scoboria A. The relative contribution of trait and social influences to the links among perceived social support, affect, and self‐ Journal of Personality. 2005 Apr;73(2):361-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00312.x
  25. Ates N, Unubol B, Bestepe EE, Bilici R. The effect of perceived social support on quality of life in Turkish men with alcohol, opiate and cannabis use disorder. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse. 2023 May 2;22(2):316-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332640.2019.1685051
  26. Dorard G, Bungener C, Corcos M, Berthoz S. Estime de soi, coping, soutien social perçu et dépendance au cannabis chez l’adolescent et le jeune adulte. L'Encéphale. 2014 Jun 1;40(3):255-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2013.04.014
  27. Swain NR, Gibb SJ, Horwood LJ, Fergusson DM. Alcohol and cannabis abuse/dependence symptoms and life satisfaction in young adulthood. Drug and alcohol Review. 2012 May;31(3):327-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00339.x
  28. Tartaglia S, Miglietta A, Gattino S. Life satisfaction and cannabis use: A study on young adults. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2017 Jun;18:709-18. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s10902-016-9742-0
  29. Keyes CL, Shmotkin D, Ryff CD. Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of personality and social psychology. 2002 Jun;82(6):1007. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007
  30. Thimm JC. Personality and early maladaptive schemas: A five-factor model perspective. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry. 2010 Dec 1;41(4):373-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.03.009
  31. Barnwell SS, Earleywine M, Wilcox R. Cannabis, motivation, and life satisfaction in an internet sample. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy. 2006 Dec;1(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-1-2
  32. Meloun M, Militký J. Statistical data analysis: A practical guide. Woodhead Publishing Limited; 2011.
  33. Humeniuk R, Ali R, Babor TF, Farrell M, Formigoni ML, Jittiwutikarn J, De Lacerda RB, Ling W, Marsden J, Monteiro M, Nhiwatiwa S. Validation of the alcohol, smoking and substance involvement screening test (ASSIST). Addiction. 2008 Jun;103(6):1039-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02114.x
  34. Humeniuk R, Henry-Edwards S, Ali R, Poznyak V, Monteiro MG, World Health Organization. The Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST): manual for use in primary care. 2010 jan. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44320
  35. Humeniuk R, Ali R, Babor TF, Farrell M, Formigoni ML, Jittiwutikarn J, De Lacerda RB, Ling W, Marsden J, Monteiro M, Nhiwatiwa S. Validation of the alcohol, smoking and substance involvement screening test (ASSIST). Addiction. 2008 Jun;103(6):1039-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02114.x
  36. Hooshyari Z, Sadralssadat J, Sadralssadat L. Estimation of Validation and Reliability of Screening Test of Tobacco, Alcohol and Addictive Drugs in Iran . etiadpajohi 2013; 7 (27):37-52. (Persian)
  37. Besharat MA. Development and validation of adult attachment inventory. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011 Jan 1;30:475-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.093
  38. Besharat MA. Factorial and cross-cultural validity of a Farsi version of the Anger Rumination Scale. Psychological Reports. 2011 Feb;108(1):317-28. https://doi.org/10.2466/02.08.09.PR0.108.1.317-328
  39. Besharat MA, Mohammad Mehr R. Psychometric Sychometric Evaluation of Anger Rumination Scale. Advances In Nursing and Midwifery (Faculty of Nursing of Midwifery Quarterly) [Internet]. 2009;19(65):36-43. (Persian)  Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/108310/en
  40. Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of personality assessment. 1988 Mar 1;52(1):30-41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2
  41. Shokri, O., Reza Kormi Nouri, R., Farahani, M. N., Moradi, A. The Quality of College Life from Viewpoint of Native and Non-Native Students of Tehran’s Public Universities. Journal of Iranian Cultural Research, 2016; 9(2): 75-100. (Persian) https://doi.org/10.22035/ijcr.2016.308
  42. Diener ED, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment. 1985 Feb 1;49(1):71-5. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
  43. SHEIKHI MANSOUREH, ALI HOUMAN HEIDAR, AHADI HASAN, SEPAH MANSOUR MOZHGAN. PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF SATISFACTION WITH LIFE SCALE. JOURNAL OF THOUGHT & BEHAVIOR IN CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY [Internet]. 2011;5(19):15-26. (Persian) Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/172136/en
  44. Nakhoul L, Obeid S, Sacre H, Haddad C, Soufia M, Hallit R, Akel M, Salameh P, Hallit S. Attachment style and addictions (alcohol, cigarette, waterpipe and internet) among Lebanese adolescents: a national study. BMC psychology. 2020 Dec;8(1):1-0. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00404-6
  45. Mikulincer M, Shaver PR. Boosting attachment security to promote mental health, prosocial values, and inter-group tolerance. Psychological inquiry. 2007 Aug 13;18(3):139-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400701512646
  46. Gliksberg O, Livne O, Lev-Ran S, Rehm J, Hasson-Ohayon I, Feingold D. The association between cannabis use and perceived social support: The mediating role of decreased social network. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2022 Oct;20(5):2799-812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-021-00549-4
  47. Lac A, Luk JW. Testing the amotivational syndrome: Marijuana use longitudinally predicts lower self-efficacy even after controlling for demographics, personality, and alcohol and cigarette use. Prevention Science. 2018 Feb;19(2):117-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0811-3
  48. Fox CL, Towe SL, Stephens RS, Walker DD, Roffman RA. Motives for cannabis use in high-risk adolescent users. Psychology of addictive behaviors. 2011 Sep;25(3):492. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024331
  49. Vasconcelos-Filho FS, da Rocha-E-Silva RC, Martins JE, Godinho WD, da Costa VV, Ribeiro JK, et al. Neuroprotector effect of daily 8-minutes of high-intensity interval training in rat Aβ1-42 Alzheimer disease model. Current Alzheimer Research. 2020;17(14):1320-33. https://doi.org/10.2174/1567205018666210218161856
مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی سبزوار
دوره 31، شماره 3
مرداد و شهریور 1403
صفحه 353-363
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 21 آذر 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 02 اسفند 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 06 اسفند 1402
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار