1استادیار، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بجنورد، بجنورد، ایران.
2دانشجوی کارشناسی‌ارشد، گروه مشاوره، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بجنورد، بجنورد، ایران.
تاریخ دریافت: 07 مرداد 1395،
تاریخ بازنگری: 15 شهریور 1395،
تاریخ پذیرش: 09 آذر 1395
چکیده
اهداف بررسی‌ها نشان می‌دهد که حدود 80درصد اختلاف‌های زناشویی به‌دلیل نارضایتی جنسی روی می‌دهد. شناسایی عوامل پیش‌بینی‌کننده رضایت جنسی، به‌ویژه در زنان، در پیشگیری از این مسائل مفید است. پژوهش حاضر، با هدف بررسی رابطه ویژگی‌های شخصیتی پنج عامل بزرگ با رضایت جنسی زنان متأهل ساکن شهر مشهد انجام شد. مواد و روش ها مطالعه حاضر، مطالعه‌ای توصیفی از نوع هم‌بستگی بود و جامعه آماری آن را تمامی زنان متأهل ساکن شهر مشهد تشکیل می‌دادند که تعداد 115 نفر از آن‌ها با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری دردسترس به‌عنوان نمونه انتخاب شده بودند. در این پژوهش برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها، پرسشنامه رضایت جنسی زنان (SSS-W) و پرسشنامه شخصیتی پنج عامل بزرگ شخصیتی (NEO) و برای تحلیل داده‌ها، روش رگرسیون چندگانه و برای اعتباریابی، تحلیل عاملی تأییدی با استفاده از نسخه بیست‌ویکم نرم‌افزار AMOS و ضریب هم‌بستگی پیرسون با استفاده از نسخه نوزدهم نرم‌افزار SPSS به‌کار گرفته شد. یافته ها یافته‌ها نشان داد که ضریب هم‌بستگی بین ویژگی‌های شخصیتی پنج عامل بزرگِ روان‌رنجورخویی (407/0-=R)، برون‌گرایی (310/0=R)، بازبودن دربرابر تجارب (232/0=R)، توافق‌جویی (258/0=R) و وجدانی‌بودن (389/0=R) با رضایت جنسی زنان معنی‌دار است (0001/0>P). تحلیل رگرسیون با روش گام‌به‌گام نشان داد که از میان پنج متغیر مستقل، فقط دو متغیر روان‌رنجورخویی و وجدانی‌بودن جواز ورود به معادله رگرسیون را پیدا کرد (203/0=R2، 0001/0>P). نتیجه گیری نتایج نشان داد که می‌توان رضایت جنسی زنان را ازطریق ویژگی‌های شخصیتی آن‌ها پیش‌بینی کرد. همچنین درنظرگرفتن دو متغیر شخصیتی روان‌رنجورخویی و وجدانی‌بودن در بررسی‌های مربوط‌به ناسازگاری‌های جنسی زنان توصیه می‌شود.
1Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, School of Humanities, University of Bojnord, Bojnord, Iran.
2MA Student, Department of Counseling, School of Humanities, University of Bojnord, Bojnord, Iran.
چکیده [English]
Objectives Based on the reported studies, approximately 80% of marital disputes result from sexual dissatisfaction. It is helpful to identify factors predicting sexual satisfaction, especially in females, to prevent such problems. The current study aimed at examining simple and multiple factorial relationships between big 5 personality traits and sexual satisfaction in a population of married females in Mashhad, Iran. Methods Statistical population in the current study included all married females who lived in Mashhad. A total of 115 females were selected by the available sampling method. To collect data, the sexual satisfaction scale for women (SSS-W) and big 5 personality questionnaire (NEO) were employed. The data were analyzed by multiple regressions and validated by confirmatory factor analysis using AMOS-21 software and Pearson correlation coefficient using SPSS version 19. Results Findings of the current study indicated a significant relationship between the big 5 personality traits, including neuroticism (R=-0.407), extraversion (R=0.310), openness (R=0.232), agreeableness (R=0.258) and conscientiousness (R=0.389), and sexual satisfaction in females (P<0.0001). Stepwise multiple regression analyses that among the 5 independent variables, only 2 variables of neuroticism and conscientiousness could be used in the regression equation (R2=0.203, P<0.0001). Conclusion Findings of the current study indicated that females’ sexual satisfaction can be predicted through their personality traits. Also, personality variables, especially neuroticism and conscientiousness, were recommended to examine the sexual incompatibility.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Women sexual satisfaction, Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness
مراجع
Noranipor R, Besharat M, Yousofi E. [Compare the relationship between sexual knowledge and attitude with marital satisfaction of couples living in young researcher campus of Shahid Beheshti (Persian)]. Journal of Research and Consulting. 2007; 24: 27-39. Janetius ST. Marriage and marital adjustment [MSc. thesis]. Manila: De La Salle University; 1998. Vandermassen G. Sexual selection: A tale of male bias and feminist denial. The European Journal of Women’s Studies. 2004; 11(1):9–26. doi: 10.1177/1350506804039812 Ohadi B. [Normal and abnormal human sexuality (Persian)]. Tehran: Sadegh Hedayat Pub; 2004. Shamloo S. [Mental health (Persian)]. Tehran: Roshd Pub; 2001. Amiri Pebdani M, Taavoni S, Haghani H. [Effect of ginkgo biloba extract on sexual satisfaction in 50-60 years menopausal women in Tehran (Persian)]. Quarterly Journal of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences. 2013; 20(2): 204-212. Movahed M, Azizy T. A study on the relationship between the sexual satisfaction of women in a married life and conflicts between spouses, among married women in Shiraz (Persian)]. woman in development and politics (Woman’s Research). 2011; 9(2): 191-216. Banijamali Sh, Nafisi Gh, Yazdi M. [Finding the root causes of family disintegration in relation to characteristics of psychological-social boys and girls before marriage (Persian)]. Journal of Psychology and Education Sciences. 2004; 2(1):143-70. Cervone D, Lawrence AP. Personality: Theory and research. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2007. Firoozi M, Azmoude E, Asgharipoor N. [The relationship between personality traits and sexual self-esteem and its components (Persian)]. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research. 2016; 21(3):225-31. Botwin MD, Buss DM, Shackelford TK. Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and mrital satisfaction. Journal of Personality. 1997; 65(1):107–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00531.x Bouchard G, Lussier Y, Sabourin S. Personality and marital adjustment: Utility of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1999; 61(3):651-60. doi: 10.2307/353567 Mohammadzade EA, Jomehri F, Borjali A. [Relationship between similarity and complementarity in personality factors with marital satisfaction (Persian)]. Quarterly Educational Psychology. 2008; 3(10):55-71. Ahadi B. Relationship between personality and marital satisfaction. Contemporary Psychology. 2008; 2(4): 32-6. Geist RL, Gilbert DG. Correlates of expressed and felt emotion during marital conflict: Satisfaction, personality, process, and outcome. Personality and Individual Differences. 1996; 21(1):49–60. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(96)00049-9 Russell RJH, Wells PA. Personality and quality of marriage. British Journal of Psychology. 1994; 85(2):161–8. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1994.tb02516.x Shiota MN, Levenson RW. Birds of a feather don't always fly farthest: Similarity in Big Five personality predicts more negative marital satisfaction trajectories in long-term marriages. Psychology and Aging. 2007; 22(4):666-75. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.4.666 Watson D, Hubbard B, Wiese D. General traits of personality and affectivity as predictors of satisfaction in intimate relationships: Evidence from self- and partner-ratings. Journal of Personality. 2000; 68(3):413–49. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00102 Abdollahzade H. [Relationship between personality traits (and other family factors) and marital satisfaction in couples of Damghan (Persian)] [PhD dissertation]. Tabriz: University of Tabriz; 2004. Tobin RM, Graziano WG, Vanman EJ, Tassinary LG. Personality, emotional experience, and efforts to control emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2000; 79(4):656–69. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.656 McCrae RR, Costa Jr. PT. Rotation to maximize the construct validity of factors in the NEO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 1989; 24(1):107–24. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2401_7 Roshan chesly R, Shairi M, Atri Fard M, Nik Khah A, Ghaem Maghami B, Rahimi Rad A. [Investigating psychometric properties of NEO-Five factor inventory (NEO-FFI) (Persian)]. Daneshvar Raftar. 2006; 13(6):27–37. Graziano WG, Jensen-Campbell LA, Hair EC. Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1996; 70(4):820–35. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.820. Goldberg LR. An alternative description of personality: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990; 59(6):1216–29. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216 Jarvis MO. The long term role of newlywed conscientiousness and religiousness in marriag [PhD thesis]. Austin: University of Texas; 2006. Flett GL, Hewitt PL, Blankstein KR, Mosher SW. Perfectionism, life events, and depressive symptoms: A test of diathesis-stress model. Current Psychology. 1995; 14 (2): 112-128. Flett GL, Hewitt PL, Blankstein KR, Mosher SW. Perfectionism, life events, and depressive symptoms: A test of a diathesis-stress model. Current Psychology. 1995; 14(2):112–37. doi: 10.1007/bf02686885 Garousi MT, Mehryar AH, Ghazi Tabatabaei M. [Application of the NEO PIR test and analytic evaluation of its characteristics and factorial structure among Iranian university students (Persian)]. Journal of Humanities. 2001; 11:173-98. Fisher TD, McNulty JK. Neuroticism and marital satisfaction: The mediating role played by the sexual relationship. Journal of Family Psychology. 2008; 22(1):112–22. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.22.1.112 Mohammadzade EA, Rahimi pordanjani T, Jomheri F, Borjali A. [The relationship of the big five personality factors of neuroticism, extraversion, agreeableness, openness to experience and conscientiousness to marital satisfaction (Persian)]. Counseling Research and Developments. 2010; 9(33):51-66. Zoby MM. The association between personality and marital and relationship outcome [PhD thesis]. Virginia: Regent University; 2005.
ابتدای صفحه