Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 medicine Graduated، Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences,Tehran,Iran
3 Assistant Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences,Tehran,Iran
Abstract
Introduction: Although modern cesarean section techniques advocate for shorter hospital stays, postoperative complications remain relatively common. These complications may include ileus, gastric discomfort, and vomiting, all of which can adversely affect patient recovery and overall experience. This study aimed to investigate the effects of early versus delayed feeding after cesarean section on digestive function and gastrointestinal complications.
Materials and Methods: A single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 125 pregnant women who underwent uncomplicated elective cesarean deliveries. Participants were randomly assigned to either early oral feeding (EOF) 4 hours post-delivery (n = 57) or late oral feeding (LOF) 8 hours post-delivery (n = 68). Follow-up continued until discharge. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 software, employing t-tests and chi-square tests.
Results: This study showed that the time to first bowel movement after surgery was significantly shorter in the EOF group compared to the LOF group. However, the incidence of abdominal cramps did not differ significantly between the two groups.
Conclusion: The findings suggest that early oral feeding after cesarean delivery may facilitate faster recovery of bowel function, although it does not significantly impact gastrointestinal complications. This study aims to optimize feeding time after cesarean delivery.
Keywords
- Cesarean section
- early oral feeding
- digestive function
- digestive complications
- postoperative complications
Main Subjects
- Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, Bing-Shun W, Thomas J, Van Look P, et al. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21(2):98-113. DOI: 1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00786.x
- Rollins M, Lucero J. Overview of anesthetic considerations for Cesarean delivery. Br Med Bull. 2012;101:105-25. DOI: 1093/bmb/ldr050
- Masood SN, Masood Y, Naim U, Masood MF. A randomized comparative trial of early initiation of oral maternal feeding versus conventional oral feeding after cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;126(2):115-9. DOI: 1016/j.ijgo.2014.02.023
- Bauer AJ, Boeckxstaens GE. Mechanisms of postoperative ileus. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2004;16 Suppl 2:54-60. DOI: 1111/j.1743-3150.2004.00558.x
- Miedema BW, Johnson JO. Methods for decreasing postoperative gut dysmotility. Lancet Oncol. 2003;4(6):365-72. DOI: 1016/s1470-2045(03)01118-5
- Teigen NC, Sahasrabudhe N, Doulaveris G, Xie X, Negassa A, Bernstein J, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery at cesarean delivery to reduce postoperative length of stay: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(4):372.e1.e10.DOI: 1016/j.ajog.2019.10.009
- Meng X, Chen K, Yang C, Li H, Wang X. The Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:694385. DOI: 3389/fmed.2021.694385
- Saad AF, Saoud F, Diken ZM, Hegde S, Kuhlmann MJ, Wen TS, et al. Early versus Late Feeding after Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Perinatol. 2016;33(4):415-9. DOI: 1055/s-0035-1565918
- Mawson AL, Bumrungphuet S, Manonai J. A randomized controlled trial comparing early versus late oral feeding after cesarean section under regional anesthesia. Int J Womens Health. 2019;11:519-25. DOI: 2147/IJWH.S222922
- Teoh WH, Shah MK, Mah CL. A randomised controlled trial on beneficial effects of early feeding post-Caesarean delivery under regional anaesthesia. Singapore Med J. 2007;48(2):152-7.
- Chen D, Lang B, Wu L, Zhou S, Chen S. Early oral feeding within two hours for parturients compared with delayed oral feeding after cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2024 Oct 1;24(1):623. doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06838-9
- Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Grimes DA, Altman DG. Assessing the quality of randomization from reports of controlled trials published in obstetrics and gynecology journals. JAMA. 1994 Jul 13; 272(2): 125-8. doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03520020051014
- Gupta SK. Intention-to-treat concept: a review. Perspect Clin Res. 2011 Jul; 2(3): 109-12. 4 – Newell DOI: 10.4103/2229-3485.83221
- McCoy CE. Understanding the intention-to-treat principle in randomized controlled trials. West J Emerg Med. 2017; 18 (6): 1075–8 [Internet]. doi: 5811/westjem.2017.8.3598
- .Mohamed Salim A, Ahmed Mansour AE, Aly AA, Elsayed S. Early Versus Delayed Oral Feeding after Uncomplicated Cesarean Section. Benha Journal of Applied Sciences. 2023 Nov 26;8(11):25-8. doi.org/ 21608/bjas.2023.243347.1271
- Xiao-Li H, Yu-Peng W, Lu-Ping W, Xiao-Feng S, Li-Hua Y, Ai-Hua Z, Xiao-Xiao Z, Xiao-Feng W. Impact of varied feeding protocols on gastrointestinal function recovery in the early postoperative period following repeat cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2024;24:1. -9. DOI:10.1186/s12884-024-06983-1
- Hosny Abd Elhady E, Mustafa F, Hasan OA. Study of Early versus Delayed Oral Fluid and Food after Cesarean Section. International Journal of Medical Arts. 2024 Jun 1;6(6):4553-8. DOI: 21608/ijma.2024.261352.1908
- Ismail MT, Azazy A, Mohamad HE, Ettywah AA. Comparative Study between Postoperative Outcomes of Early and Late Oral Feeding after Cesarean Section. Al-Azhar International Medical Journal. 2024;5(9):39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58675/2682-339X.2668
- Ogbadua AO, Agida TE, Akaba GO, Akitoye OA, Ekele BA. Early Versus Delayed Oral Feeding after Uncomplicated Cesarean Section under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Niger J Surg. 2018;24(1):6-11. DOI: 4103/njs.NJS_26_17
- Guo J, Long S, Li H, Luo J, Han D, He T. Early versus delayed oral feeding for patients after cesarean. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;128(2):100-5. DOI: 1016/j.ijgo.2014.07.039
- Lloyd DA, Powell-Tuck J. Artificial nutrition: principles and practice of enteral feeding. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2004;17(2):107-18. DOI: 1055/s-2004-828657
- Canzan F, Caliaro A, Cavada ML, Mezzalira E, Paiella S, Ambrosi E. The effect of early oral postoperative feeding on the recovery of intestinal motility after gastrointestinal surgery: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2022;17(8):e0273085. DOI: 1371/journal.pone.0273085
)