Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor Nuclear Physics, Faculty of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran

2 MSc Student, Nuclear Physics, Faculty of Nuclear Physics and Engineering, Shahroud University of Technology, Shahroud, Iran

Abstract

Ionizing radiation modifies the molecular structure of the cell and ultimately disrupts its function. Brachytherapy by the Gamma Iridium-192 source is one of the most widely used radiotherapy methods in cervical and prostate cancer. For this reason, in the research, we investigated the damage to the DNA molecule by photons and secondary electrons of the source at different distances, and then we obtained the dose rates in the defined dimensions of DNA.
In this work, using the MCNPX code, we calculated the flux and photon dose and secondary electrons from iradium-192 Brachytherapy, in approximate dimensions of DNA in a water phantom. Then, using the electron flux obtained, through the MCDS code, we investigated the efficiency of DNA breaks at different distances from the source.
The simulations indicated that DNA damage is different at various distances from the source and it depends on the number of secondary electrons reaching that region as well as its energy. With increasing the distance from the source, the values of the probability distribution function of DNA single-strand and two-strand breaks diminish. It was also observed that these values had peaks at distances of 0.04 and 2.5 cm from the source, where the maximum probability of single-strand break at those distances was 8.06% and 3.9%, respectively, and the maximum probability of the two-strand break at those distances was 0.54% and 0.11%, respectively. It is notable that the dose reaching the DNA at these distances was 27.202 and 0.005 mGy/h, respectively.

Keywords

Main Subjects

[1].   Wragg A, Gill MR, Turton D. Tuning the cellular uptake properties of luminescent heterobimetallic iridium(iii)-ruthenium(ii) dna imaging probes. Chem Eur J. 2014; (20): 14004- 11.
[2].   Curry ThS, Dowddey JE, Murr RC. Christensen's physics of diagnostic radiology. Medical: Williams & Wilkins. 1990.
[3].   Nikjoo H, ONeill P, Goodhead DT and  Terrissol M. Computational modelling of low-energy electron-induced DNA damage by early physical and chemical events.  Int  j radiat  Biol. 1997; (71): 467-83.
[4].   Min J, Lee ChW, Gu MB. Gamma-radiation dose-rate effects on DNA damage and toxicity in bacterial cells. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2003; (42): 189-92.
[5].   Watanabe R, Rahmanian Sh, Nikjoo H. Spectrum of radiation-induced clustered non-dsb damage-a monte carlo track structure modeling and calculations. Radiation Research. 2015; (183): 525-40.
[6].   Semenenko VA, and Stewart RD. A fast monte carlo algorithm to simulate the spectrum of DNA damages formed by ionizing radiation. Radiation Research. 2004; (161): 451-7.
[7].   Stewart R, Yu V, Georgakilas AG. Effects of radiation quality and oxygen on clustered DNA lesions and cell death. Radiation Research. 2011; (176): 587-602.
[8].   Angelopoulos A, Baras P, Sakelliou L. A Monte Carlo investigation of the dosimetric characteristics of the VariSource 192 Ir high dose rate brachytherapy source. Med Phys. 1999; (26):  1498-1502.
[9].   Casado FJ, Garcia-Pareja S. Dosimetric characterization of an 192Ir brachytherapy source with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE. Physica Medica. 2010; (26): 132-9.
[10].Semenenko VA and Stewart RD.   Fast Monte Carlo simulation of DNA damage formed by electrons and light ions.  Phys Med Biol. 2006; (51): 1693-1706.
[11].Villegas F, Tilly N, Ahnesjo A. Monte Carlo calculated microdosimetric spread for cell nucleus-sized targets exposed to brachytherapy 125I and 192Ir sources and 60Co cell irradiation. Phys Med Biol. 2013; (58): 6149-62.