نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم رفتاری و شناختی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

2 گروه علوم رفتاری و شناختی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.

3 گروه فیزیولوژی، مرکز تحقیقات علوم اعصاب، دانشکده پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

زمینه و هدف: بسیاری از افراد وابسته به هروئین در کارکردهای شناختی با مشکل مواجه هستند. هدف تحقیق حاضر بررسی تأثیر تمرینات مقاومتی بر کارکردهای شناختی مردان وابسته به هروئین بود.

مواد و روش‌ها: روش اجرای تحقیق، نیمه تجربی و از لحاظ هدف کاربردی بود که به شیوه پیش‌آزمون-پس‌آزمون همراه با گروه کنترل انجام شد. 30 نفر از افراد وابسته به هروئین مرکز درمان ترک اعتیاد در شهر تهران به‌عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند و در دو گروه تجربی و کنترل قرار گرفتند. شرکت‌کنندگان ابتدا، آزمون استروپ معنایی و حافظه کاری ان بک را انجام دادند. گروه‌ تجربی ۸ هفته، هفته‌ای 3 جلسه تمرین مقاومتی را به شیوه دایره‌ای شامل سه ست 12-۸ تکراری متشکل از 6 حرکت با فواصل استراحتی 2-1 دقیقه بین ست‌ها و 5-3 دقیقه بین دایره اجرای حرکات انجام دادند. پس از اتمام مداخله، پس‌آزمون به عمل آمد. از آزمون تحلیل کوواریانس جهت تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها استفاده شد.

یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد که در متغیر استروپ معنایی خنثی (026/0=p، 53/5= (27/1)f)، استروپ معنایی مثبت (001/0=p، 45/14= (27/1)f)، استروپ معنایی منفی (019/0=p، 18/6= (27/1)f) و حافظه کاری (029/0=p، 29/5= (27/1)f) بین دو گروه تفاوت معنادار وجود داشت که با توجه به تفاوت میانگین‌ها، در حافظه کاری عملکرد گروه تجربی بالاتر بود همچنین زمان واکنش استروپ معنایی (خنثی، مثبت و منفی) در گروه تجربی پایین‌تر بود.

نتیجه‌گیری: در یک نتیجه‌گیری کلی می‌توان بیان کرد که یک دوره مداخله تمرینات مقاومتی بر کارکردهای شناختی (استروپ معنایی و حافظه کاری) در مردان وابسته به هروئین تأثیر مثبت دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The effect of resistance training intervention on cognitive functions in heroin-dependent men

نویسندگان [English]

  • Haniyeh Soltani 1
  • Behrouz Abdoli 2
  • Alireza Farsi 2
  • Abbas Haghparast 3

1 Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences, University of Shahid Beheshti, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences, University of Shahid Beheshti, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Physiology, Neuroscience Research Center, medical School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Background: Many heroin-dependent people have defects in cognitive functions. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of resistance training on cognitive functions of heroin-dependent men.

Materials and Methods: The research method is quasi-experimental and applied in terms of purpose, which was done by pretest-posttest with the control group. Thirty heroin addicts from the Addiction Treatment Center in Tehran participated in study as a sample and were divided into two groups: experimental and control. Participants performed semantic strop and n-back working memory test in the pre-test. The participants of the experimental group performed resistance training sessions 3 times a week for 8 weeks in a circular manner consisting of three sets of 8-12 repetitions consisting of 6 movements with rest intervals of 1-2 minutes between sets and 3-5 minutes between movements. Finally, after the intervention, the post-test was performed. Analysis of covariance was used to analyze the data.

Results: The results showed that there was a significant difference between the experimental and control groups in the variables of neutral semantic strop (f(1.27)=5/53 p=0.026), positive (f(1.27)=14/75 p=0.001), negative (f(1.27)=6/18 p=0.019) and working memory (f(1.27)=5/29 p=0.029). Due to the difference in means, in working memory, the performance of the experimental group was higher and also the semantic strope reaction time (neutral, positive and negative) was lower in the experimental group.

Conclusion: In a general conclusion, it can be stated that a course of resistance training has a positive effect on cognitive functions (semantic strope and working memory) in heroin-dependent men.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Heroin
  • Stroop
  • Resistance Training
  • Working Memory
  • 1.Coco GL, Melchiori F, Oieni V, Infurna MR, Strauss B, Schwartze D, Rosendahl J, Gullo S. Group treatment for substance use disorder in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Journal of substance abuse treatment. 2019; 99:104-16.
  • 2.Vigna-Taglianti FD, Burroni P, Mathis F, Versino E, Beccaria F, Rotelli M, Garneri M, Picciolini A, Bargagli AM, VEdeTTE Study Group. Gender differences in heroin addiction and treatment: results from the VEdeTTE cohort. Substance use & misuse. 2016; 51(3):295-309.
  • 3.Messer T, Lammers G, Müller-Siecheneder F, Schmidt RF, Latifi S. Substance abuse in patients with bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry research. 2017; 253:338-50.
  • 4.Safarzade S, Sabahi P. The executive functions among people with heroin dependence. RJMS. 2016; 23 (146):1-9. (Persian)
  • 5.Lendínez C, Pelegrina S, Lechuga MT. Age differences in working memory updating: the role of interference, focus switching and substituting information. Acta psychologica. 2015; 157:106-13.
  • 6.Scharfen HE, Memmert D. Measurement of cognitive functions in experts and elite athletes: A meta‐analytic review. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2019; 33(5):843-60.
  • 7.Hagen E, Erga AH, Hagen KP, Nesvåg SM, McKay JR, Lundervold AJ, Walderhaug E. Assessment of executive function in patients with substance use disorder: a comparison of inventory-and performance-based assessment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2016; 66:1-8.
  • 8.Yoon DH, Lee JY, Song W. Effects of resistance exercise training on cognitive function and physical performance in cognitive frailty: a randomized controlled trial. The journal of nutrition, health & aging. 2018; 22(8):944-51.
  • 9.Unhjem R, Flemmen G, Hoff J, Wang E. Maximal strength training as physical rehabilitation for patients with substance use disorder; a randomized controlled trial. BMC sports science, medicine and rehabilitation. 2016; 8(1):7.
  • 10.Lopez P, Pinto RS, Radaelli R, Rech A, Grazioli R, Izquierdo M, Cadore EL. Benefits of resistance training in physically frail elderly: a systematic review. Aging clinical and experimental research. 2018; 30(8):889-99.
  • 11.Smith JJ, Morgan PJ, Plotnikoff RC, Stodden DF, Lubans DR. Mediating effects of resistance training skill competency on health-related fitness and physical activity: The ATLAS cluster randomised controlled trial. Journal of sports sciences. 2016; 34(8):772-9.
  • 12.Wu CH, Karageorghis CI, Wang CC, Chu CH, Kao SC, Hung TM, Chang YK. Effects of acute aerobic and resistance exercise on executive function: An ERP study. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2019; 22(12):1367-72.
  • 13.Gelfo F, Mandolesi L, Serra L, Sorrentino G, Caltagirone C. The neuroprotective effects of experience on cognitive functions: evidence from animal studies on the neurobiological bases of brain reserve. Neuroscience. 2018; 370:218-35.
  • 14.Brush CJ, Olson RL, Ehmann PJ, Osovsky S, Alderman BL. Dose–response and time course effects of acute resistance exercise on executive function. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2016; 38(4):396-408.
  • 15.de Almeida SS, Teixeira EL, Merege-Filho CA, Dozzi Brucki SM, de Salles Painelli V. Acute effects of resistance and functional-task exercises on executive function of obese older adults: Two counterbalanced, crossover, randomized exploratory studies. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology. 2020.
  • 16.Gold LH, Frierson RL, editors. The American Psychiatric Publishing textbook of forensic psychiatry. American Psychiatric Pub; 2017.
  • 17.Kinoshita S, Mills L, Norris D. The semantic Stroop effect is controlled by endogenous attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2018; 44(11):1730.
  • 18.Meule A. Reporting and interpreting working memory performance in n-back tasks. Frontiers in psychology. 2017; 8:352.
  • 19.Tsuk S, Netz Y, Dunsky A, Zeev A, Carasso R, Dwolatzky T, Salem R, Behar S, Rotstein A. The Acute Effect of Exercise on Executive Function and Attention: Resistance versus Aerobic Exercise. Advances in Cognitive Psychology. 2019; 15(3):208.
  • 20.Soga K, Masaki H, Gerber M, Ludyga S. Acute and long-term effects of resistance training on executive function. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement. 2018; 2(2):200-7.
  • 21.Naderi A, Shaabani F, Esmaeili A, Salman Z, Borella E, Degens H. Effects of low and moderate acute resistance exercise on executive function in community-living older adults. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology. 2019; 8(1):106.
  • 22.Wen HJ, Tsai CL. Effects of Acute Aerobic Exercise Combined with Resistance Exercise on Neurocognitive Performance in Obese Women. Brain Sciences. 2020; 10(11):767.
  • 23.Ebrahimi m, Mirzaali P, Avandi M. Effect of 8 weeks resistance training on serum BDNF level and memory performance in middle-aged women with metabolic syndrome. Journal of Physiology of Exercise and Physical Activity. 2015; 9(1):1313-1324. (Persian)
  • 24.Martinelli I, Tomassoni D, Moruzzi M, Traini E, Amenta F, Khosrow Tayebati S. Obesity and metabolic syndrome affect the cholinergic transmission and cognitive functions. CNS & Neurological Disorders-Drug Targets (Formerly Current Drug Targets-CNS & Neurological Disorders). 2017; 16(6):664-76.