نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه الزهرا )س(، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه الزهرا )س(، تهران، ایران
3 استاد، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه الزهرا )س(، تهران، ایران
4 دانشیار روانشناسی شناختی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران.
چکیده
زمینه و هدف سطح فعالیت سیستم‌های مغزی رفتاری با طیف وسیعی از اختلال‌های هیجانی، از جمله اضطراب و افسردگی مرتبط است. هدف مطالعه حاضر، مقایسه سیستم‌های مغزی رفتاری در افراد مبتلا به اضطراب، افراد مبتلا به افسردگی و افراد سالم بود.
مواد و روش‌ها این پژوهش، یک مطالعه مقطعی بود. 45 فرد مبتلا به اضطراب (نمره متوسط به بالا در پرسش‌نامه اضطراب و نمره کم در پرسش‌نامه افسردگی بک) و 45 فرد مبتلا به افسردگی (نمره متوسط به بالا در پرسش‌نامه افسردگی و نمره کم در پرسش‌نامه اضطراب بک) که به مراکز خصوصی و دولتی سلامت شهر جیرفت مراجعه کرده بودند از طریق نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند و با 45 فرد سالم (نمره پایین در پرسش‌نامه‌های اضطراب و افسردگی بک) براساس متغیرهای سن و جنسیت همتا شدند. بعد از جلب رضایت آگاهانه، شرکت‌کنندگان به پرسش‌نامه‌های افسردگی بک، اضطراب بک و پنج عاملی جکسون، پاسخ دادند و براساس نمره پرسش‌نامه‌ها، در گروه‌های مورد نظر قرار گرفتند. داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزار spss21 از طریق آزمون تحلیل واریانس یک‌راهه، تحلیل شد.
یافته‌ها تحلیل داده‌ها نشان داد که بین گروه‌ها در سیستم‌های بازداری رفتاری، جنگ، گریز و وقفه، تفاوت‌های معناداری وجود دارد. همچنین تفاوت گروه‌ها در سیستم فعال‌ساز رفتاری، معنادار نبود.
نتیجه‌گیری با توجه به متفاوت بودن عملکرد سیستم‌های مغزی رفتاری افراد مبتلا به اضطراب و افراد مبتلا به افسردگی با افراد سالم، شاید این تئوری به توضیح سبب‌شناسی اضطراب و افسردگی کمک کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Comparison of Brain-Behavioral Systems in Patient with Anxiety, Patient with depression and Healthy Individuals
نویسندگان [English]
- saeedeh azaraeen 1
- Roshanak khodabakhsh 2
- Zohre Khosravi 3
- Masoud Fazilatpur 4
1 MSc Phd student of psychology, department of psychology, AL Zahra University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor of psychology, department of psychology, AL Zahra University, Tehran, Iran
3 Profesor of psychology, department of psychology, AL Zahra University, Tehran, Iran
4 Associate Professor of cognitive psychology, Department of Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
چکیده [English]
Introduction: Brain-Behavioral Systems contribute to the development of wide variety of emotional disorders, including anxiety and depression. The aim of this study was to compare the Brain- Behavioral Systems in patients with anxiety, patients with depression, and healthy individuals.
Materials and Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study in which 45 individuals with anxiety (moderate to high score in Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and low score in BDI-II) and 45 individuals with depression (moderate to high score in Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and low score in BAI) who referred to private and public health centers in Jiroft were selected through purposive sampling and matched with 45 healthy individuals (low score in BDI-II and BAI) for age and gender. After informed consent, participants were asked to fill the questionnaires including Jackson-5 Scale, 2nd version of Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and were allocated to different groups based on the score of the questionnaires. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance by spss21 software.
Results: Result showed that there were significant differences between three groups in Behavior Inhibition System, Fight, Flight and Freeze. Also, the differences were not significant in Behavioral Activation System.
Conclusion: Given the different functions of the Brain -Behavioral Systems in patients with anxiety, patients with depression, and healthy individuals, this theory may explain the etiology of anxiety and depression.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Brain -Behavioral Systems
- depression
- anxiety
- Healthy Individuals
[7]. Gray JA. Framework for a taxonomy of psychiatric disorder. In: van Goozen SHM ,Van de Poll NE, editors. Emotions: Essays on emotion theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates1994. 29-59 p.
[8]. Corr PJ. Reinfocement sensitivity theory (RST): introduction in P. J. Corrn (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
[9]. Gray J, A, , Mcnaughto N. The psychology of anxiety and enquiry in to the function of the septo-hipocamppal system. New York: Oxford university 2000.
[10]. Maack DJ, Tull MT, Gratz KL. Examining the incremental contribution of behavioral inhibition to generalized anxiety disorder relative to other Axis I disorders and cognitive-emotional vulnerabilities. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2012;26(6):689-95.
[12]. Randelovic K, Smederevac S, Colovic P, Corr PJ. Fear and Anxiety in Social Setting An Experimental Study. Journal of Individual Differences,. 2018;39(2):61-75.
[14]. Hundt NE, Nelson-Gray RO, Kimbrel NA, Mitchell JT, Kwapil TR .The interaction of reinforcement sensitivity and life events in the prediction of anhedonic depression and anxiety symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences. 2007;43:1001-12.
[15]. Trew JL. Exploring the roles of approach and avoidance in depression: an integrative model. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011;31(7):1156-68.
[19]. Muris P, Meesters C, de Kanter E, Timmerman PE. Behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation system scales for children: Relationships with Eysenck’s personality traits and psychopathological symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences. 2005;38:831-841.
[21]. Coplan RJ, Wilson J, Frohlick SL, Zelenski J. A person-oriented analysis of behavioral inhibition and behavioral activation in children. Personality and Individual Differences. 2006;41:917-27.
[22]. Torrubia R, Avila C, Caseras X. Reinforcement Sensitivity Scale. In P. A. Corr (Ed.), The Reinsfocemet Sencitivity of Personality. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
[23]. Beak AT, steer RA, Brown Gk. Beck Depression Inventory for measuring depression. Archive of General Psychology. 1996;4:561-71.
[24]. Fata L. Meaning Assignment Structures of Emotional States and Cognitive Processing of Emotional Information: Comparing two conceptual frameworks. PHD Thesis; Tehran. 2003 .(Text in Persian)
[26]. Jackson CJ. Jackson-5 scales of revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (r-RST) and their application to dysfunctional real world outcomes. Journal of Research in Personality. 2009;43:556-69.
[27]. Hasani J, Salehi S, Azad MR. The psychometric properties of Jackson’s five factor questionnaire: scales of revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (r-RST). Rsesearch of Mental Health. 2012;6(3):60-73 .(Text in Persian)
[29]. Schofield CA, Coles ME, Gibb BE. Retrospective reports of behavioral inhibition and young adults’ current symptoms of social anxiety, depression, and anxious arousal . .Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2009;23:884-90.
[30]. Struijs SY, Lamers F, Vroling MS, Roelofs K, Spinhoven P, Penninx BWJH. Approach and avoidance tendencies in depression and anxiety disorders. Psychiatry Research. 2017;256:475-81.
[32]. Hundt NE, Williams AM, Mendelson J, Nelson-Gray RO. Coping mediates relationships between reinforcement sensitivity and symptoms of psychopathology. Personality and Individual Differences. 2013;54(6):726-31.
[33]. Quilty LC, Mackew L, Bagby RM. Distinct profiles of behavioral inhibition and activation system sensitivity in unipolar vs. bipolar mood disorders. Psychiatry Research. 2014;219(1):228-31.
[34]. Dennis T. Interactions between emotion regulation strategies and affective style: Implications for trait anxiety versus depressed mood. Motivation and Emotion. 2007. 200-7.
[36]. Vollmayr B, Gass P. Learned helplessness: unique features and translational value of a cognitive depression model. Cell and Tissue Research. 2013;354(1):171-8.
[37]. Mineka S, Oehlberg K. The relevance of recent developments in classical conditioning to understanding the etiology and maintenance of anxiety disorders. Acta Psychologica. 2008;127(3):567-80.
[38]. Schmidt NB, Richey JA, Zvolensky MJ, Maner JK. Exploring human freeze responses to a threat stressor. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 2008;39(3):292-304.
)