نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی سبزوار، سبزوار، ایران

2 استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد سبزوار، سبزوار، ایران

چکیده

زمینه و هدف: در عصر حاضر تفکر انتقادی به‌عنوان یکی از هدف‌های مهم آموزشی محسوب می‌شود که باید در فرایند یادگیری، مورد توجه استادان، معلمان و فراگیران قرار گیرد. بر این اساس، پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی رابطة درگیری تحصیلی، جهت‌گیری هدف و مولفه‌های آن با تفکر انتقادی در دانشجویان رشتة پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی سبزوار انجام شد.
مواد و روش‌ها: پژوهش حاضر توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعة آماری را تمامی دانشجویان رشتة پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی سبزوار در سال 1397 به تعداد 520 نفر تشکیل دادند که تعداد 221 نفر بر اساس فرمول کوکران و به روش تصادفی نظام دار به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. داده‌های مورد نیاز پژوهش با استفاده از پرسشنامه‌های استاندارد تفکر انتقادی، جهت‌گیری هدف و درگیری تحصیلی جمع‌آوری شد و با روش‌های آمار توصیفی، همبستگی پیرسون و تحلیل رگرسیون با کمک نرم افزار SPSS20 تجزیه و تحلیل شد.
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد که بین درگیری تحصیلی، جهت‌گیری مهارت- گرایشی و جهت‌گیری عملکرد - گرایشی با تفکر انتقادی رابطة مثبت و معناداری وجود دارد (001/0p

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Relationship between academic engagement, and goal orientation with critical thinking in medical students of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences

نویسندگان [English]

  • Nasrin Mirchooli 1
  • Ali mohammad Naemi 2

1 Former Mac, student, Department of Educational Sciences, Sabzevar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sabzevar, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Ph.D. of Educational Science, Department of Educational Science, Sabzevar branch, Islamic Azad University, Sabzevar, Iran

چکیده [English]

Background and Objectives: In the present century, critical thinking has been considered as one of the most important educational goals that should be addressed by teachers, teachers and learners in the learning process. Accordingly, the present study aimed to investigate the relationship between academic engagement, goal orientation and its components with critical thinking in medical students of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences.
Materials & Methods: The present study was a descriptive correlational study. The population of this study included all medical students of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences in 2018 was 520 people. A total of 221 people were selected based on Cochran formula and systematic random sampling. The required data were collected using standard questionnaires of critical thinking, academic engagement and goal orientation. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation and regression analysis with using SPSS20.
Results: The results showed that there is a positive and significant relationship between academic engagement, mastery-approach goals and performance-approach goals with critical thinking (p

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • academic engagement
  • goal orientation
  • Critical Thinking
[1]. Kenney J. Fostering critical thinking skills: Strategies for use with intermediate gifted readers. Illinois Reading Council Journal. 2013; 41(2): 28-40.
[2]. Soemanto  W.  Education  Psychology. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. 1990. 
[3]. Fisher A. A logical basis for measuring critical thinking. Educational Leadership.2001; 4: 44-54.
[4]. Ennis R. Critical thinking. Inquiry: Critical Thinking across the Disciplines. 2011; 26(2): 5-19.
[5]. Stapleton P. A survey of attitudes towards critical thinking among Hong Kong secondary school teachers: Implications for policy change. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2011; 6(1): 14-23.
[6]. Halpern DF. Critical thinking workshop for helping our students become better thinker. University of Louisville. 2013.
[7]. Facione AP. Critical thinking: What It is and why it counts, CA, Millbrae: Measured Reasons LLC, Hermosa Beach. Retrieved from http://go.roguecc.edu/sites/go.roguecc.edu/files/dept/nursing/PDF. 2013.
[8]. Blumenfeld P, Modell J, Bartko WT, Secada W, Fredricks JA, Friedel J, Paris A. School engagement of inner-city students during middle childhood. In Developmental Pathways Through Middle Childhood: Rethinking Contexts and Diversity as Resources (pp. 145-170). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2005.
[9]. Reschly AL, Christenson SL. Jingle J, Conceptual H. Evolution and Future Directions of the Engagement Construct. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (eds.). Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 3-19). New York: Springer. 2012.
[10]. Ouweneel E, Le Blanc PM, Schaufeli WB. Flourishing students: A longitudinal study on positive emotion, personal resource and study engagement. The journal of positive psychology: Dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice. 2011; 6(2): 142-53.
[11]. Wang M. Eccles S. School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional Perspective. Learning and Instruction. 2013; 28: 12-23.
[12]. Wolters CA, Rosental H. The relation between students’ motivational bliefs
and their use of motivational regulation strategies. International Journal of Educational Research. 2000; 33: 801-20.
[13]. Swart R. Critical thinking instruction and technology enhanced learning from the student perspective: A mixed methods research study. Nurse Education in Practice. 2017; 23: 30-9.
[14]. Shieh, RS, Chang W. Implementing the interactive response system in a high school physics context: intervention and reflections. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 2013; 29(5): 748-61.
[15]. Lee J, Song H, Hong A. Exploring Factors, and Indicators for Measuring Students’ Sustainable Engagement in e-Learning. Sustainability. 2019; 11: 1-12.
[16]. Abdul Sattar A, Kouar R, Gillani SA. Exploring Nursing Students Engagement in Their Learning Environment. American Journal of Nursing Research. 2018; 6(1): 18-23.
[17]. Hoffman RL, Hudak-Rosander C, Datta J, Morris JB, Kelz RR. Goal orientation in surgical residents: a study of the motivation behind learning. J Surg Rese. 2014; 190 (2): 451-6.
[18]. Elliot AJ. Integrating the “classic” and “contemporary” approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. In P. Pintrich & M. Maehr (eds.). Advances in motivation and achievement (243-279). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 2010.
[19]. Elliot AJ, McGregor H. A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2001; 80 (3): 501-19.
[20]. Poondej C, Koul R, Sujivorakul C. Achievement goal orientation and the critical thinking disposition of college students across academic programs. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 2012; 37(4): 504e518.
[21]. Meral E, Taş Y. Modelling the relationships among social studies learning environment, self-efficacy, and critical thinking disposition. Pegem Eğitim Ve Öğretim Dergisi. 2017; 7(3): 349-66. 
[22].Shyr WJ, Feng HY, Zeng LW, Hsieh YM, Shih CY. The relationship between language learning strategies and achievement goal orientations from Taiwanese engineering students in EFL learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2017; 13: 6431-43.
[23]. Shakurnia A, Baniasad M. Critical Thinking Disposition in the First- and Last-Year Medical Students and its Association with Achievement Goal Orientation. Strides Dev Med Educ. 2018; 15(1): 1-6. (Persian)
[24]. Zhou Y, Wang J.  Goal orientation, learning strategies, and academic performance in adult distance learning. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal. 2019; 47(8): e8195
[25]. Chen WW, Wong YL. The relationship between goal orientation and academic achievement in Hong Kong: The role of context. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. 2015; 24: 169-76.
[26]. Kettler T. Critical thinking skills among elementary school students: Comparing identified gifted and general education student performance. Gifted Child Quarterly. 2014; 58(2): 127-36.
[27]. Facion PA, Facion NC. The California critical thinking skills test and national league for nursing accreditation requirement. Millbrae, CA: Academic Press; 1994.
[28]. Khalili H, Soleimani M. Determination of norm validity and reliability of the scores of California critical thinking skills test, form B. Babol Univ Med Sci J. 2003; 2: 11-17. )Persian(
[29]. Hemmeti N, Noushad N, Nikdel F. Structural Modeling of Achievement Goals and Academic Motivation with Academic Engagement: Mediating Achievement Emotions. Journal of Education and Learning Studies.  2018; 10(2): 33-53. )Persian(
[30]. Zerang R. The relationship between learning styles and academic engagement and academic performance Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Educational psychology master’s thesis. Mashhad Ferdowsi University; 2012. )Persian(
[31]. Shcheglova I, Koreshnikova Y, Parshina O. "The Role of Engagement in the Development of Critical Thinking in Undergraduates," Educational Studies, Higher School of Economics. 2019; 1: 264-89.
[32]. Connell JP, Halpem-Felsher BL, Clifford E, Crichlow W, Usinger P. Hanging in there: Behavioral, psychological, and contextual factors affecting whether African American adolescents stay in high school. J. Adolesc. Res. 1995; 10: 41-63.
[33]. Kahu ER. Framing student engagement in higher education. Stud. High. Educ. 2013; 38: 758-73.
[34]. Schlechty PC. Creating create schools: six critical systems at the heart of educational innovation. Sanfrancisco: Jhon wiley and Sons. 2005.
[35]. Luo W, Hogan D, Tan LS, Kaur B, Ng PT, Chan M. Self-construal and students’ math self-concept, anxiety and achievement: An examination of achievement goals as mediators. Asian Journal of Social Psychology. 2014; 17(3): 184-95.