نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 سبزوار، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی سبزوار، دانشکده پزشکی

2 پاتولوژیست بیمارستان شهید صدوقی اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

3 دانشجوی رشتة زبان وادبیات انگلیسی، دانشگاه حکیم سبزواری، ایران

چکیده

سا بقه وهدف: در مورد میزان بیا ن نشانگر High molecular weight cytokeratin (HMWCK)در هیپرپلازی خوش خیم پروستات) Benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH و آدنو کا سینومای پروستات اطلا عات ضد ونقیضی گزارش شده است هدف از این مطالعه تعیین میزان بیان نشانگرHMWCK در BPHوآدنوکارسینومای پروستات باشاخص های آسیب شناسی و بافتی درغدد پروستات باروش ایمو نوهیستوشیمی می‌باشد.
مواد وروش ها:این مطالعه توصیفی تحلیلی بر روی تعداد 79 نمونه غدد خوش خیم BPH و آدنو کا سینومای پروستات انجام شد. بعد از ثابت‌کردن نمونه‌ها در فرمالین، پاساژ بافتی ومقطع گیری انجام شد. سپس اسلاید ها با هما توکلیسن وائوزین رنگ آمیزی و نمونه های بدخیمی توسط پاتولوژیست ها بر پایه ی گلیسون اسکور طبقه بندی شدند و برای بیان نشانگر HMWCK از روش ایمونوهیستو شیمی توسط دو نفر (دو سوکور)استفاده شدداده‌ها با آزمون کای دو‌ تجزیه و تحلیل شدند.
یا فته ها: از 79 نمونه مورد مطالعه 43 مورد هیپر پلازی خوش خیم پروستات (BPH)و36 مورد آدنوکارسینومای پروستات بود. از 43 نمونه BPH 40 مورد از نظر نشانگر HMWCK مثبت و سه نمونه منفی بودند. از 36 نمونه ی آدنوکارسینومای پروستات 35 نمونه از نظر بیان نشانگر HMWCK منفی ویک مورد مثبت بود. بیشتر نمونه های بدخیم در گلیسون اسکور بالا قرارداشتند. از نظر آماری ارتبا ط معنی داری بین نوع نمونه خوش خیم BPH و آدنو کار سینومای پروستات با نشانگر HMWCK مشا هده شدP

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The effect of the marker expression HMWCK in Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and Adenocarcinoma by immunohidtochemistery an histology methods

نویسندگان [English]

  • Rahim Golmohammadi 1
  • mohammadreza Mohajeri 2
  • Motahareh Golmohammadi 3

2 2. Pathologist, Pathology of Seadogi Hospital Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

3 Student in Literature and English Language, Department of English Language, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran

چکیده [English]

Abstract
Background and purpose: The effect of the marker expression high molecular weight cytokeratin ) HMWCK ( in Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and adenocarcinoma prostate. There were conventional reported about rate expression HMWCK in adenocarcinoma prostate The purpose of this studied was to determine expression of the marker HMWCK with histopathological parameters in BPH and adnocarcinoma in prostatic by immunohistochemistry methods.
Materials and Methods: This descriptive analytical research was conducted on 79 patients admitted to Hospital in Isfahan Iran. Samples were fixed in formalin and tissue processing and stained by hematoxilin and eosin adenocarcinoma samples were classified with Gleason pattern ( score) method by two pathologist. The effect of over expression in marker expression HMWCK was done after diagnosis by two expert(blind). The obtained data were analyzed using chi-square test.
Results: Out of the 79 specimens 43 samples were BPH and 36 samples were adenocarcinoma . in 40 samples with diagnosis BPH were observed of the marker HMWCK and 3 samples were negative. Out of 36 samples with diagnosis adenocarcinoma 35 them over expression marker of the HMWCK were negative but one samples was positive. . The over specimens malignancy were in higher Gleason score There was significant relationships between type samples (BPH and adenocarcinoma) with over expression of the marker HMWCK P

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Adenocarcinoma
  • BPH
  • HMWCK
  • Immunohistochemistry
 
 
[1].   Paśko P, Rodacki T, Domagała-Rodacka R, Owczarek D. Interactions between medications employed in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia and food- A shortreview. Biomed Pharmacother. 2016 Oct; 83: 1141-1145.
[2].   Garg M, Kaur G, Malhotra V, Garg R. Histopathological spectrum of 364 prostatic specimens including immunohistochemistry with special reference to grey zone lesions. Prostate Int. 2013; 1(4): 146-51.
[3].   Fahmy O, Khairul-Asri MG, Schubert T, Renninger M, Stenzl A, Gakis G. Clinico-pathological features and prognostic value of incidental prostatic adenocarcinoma in radical cysto-prostatectomy specimens: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 13140 patients. J Urol. 2016 Aug 25; pii: S0022-5347(16): 31143-0.
[4].   Sui X, Hu Y, Zhang C, Pan H, Li D. Prostate cancer metastasis to the distal phalanx of the left hallux: The first confirmed case and literaturereview. Oncol Lett. 2016 Aug; 12(2): 1074-1078.
[5].   Guraya SS, Prayson RA. Metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation to meningioma. J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Aug 5. pii: S0967-5868(16): 30304-6.
[6].   Helpap B. Differential diagnosis of glandular proliferations in the prostate: a conventional and immunohistochemical approach. Virchows Arch. 1998; 433: 397-405.
[7].   Seipel AH, Samaratunga H, Delahunt B, Wiklund P, Clements M, Egevad L. Immunohistochemistry of ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate and adenocarcinomas of non-prostatic origin: a comparative study. APMIS. 2016 Apr; 124(4): 263-70.
[8].   Kryvenko ON, Williamson SR, Trpkov K, Gupta NS, Athanazio D, Selig MK, Smith PT, Magi-Galluzzi C, Jorda M Virchows Arch. Small cell-like glandular proliferation of prostate: a rare lesion not related to small cell prostate cancer. 2016 Oct 14.
[9].   Carter HB, Partin AW, Walsh PC, Trock BJ, Veltri RW, Nelson WG, Coffey DS, Singer EA. Gleason score 6 adenocarcinoma: should it be labeled as cancer? Epstein JI.J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 10; 30(35): 4294-6.
[10].Eggener SE. Risk of lymph node metastases in pathological gleason score≤6 prostate adenocarcinoma: Analysis of institutional and population-based databases. Urol Oncol. 2016 Sep 27. pii: S1078-1439(16): 30212-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.08.004.
[11].Parimi V, Goyal R,  Poropatich K, Yang, XJ. Neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer: a review. Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2014; 2(4): 273-285.
[12].Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB, Egevad LL. ISUP Grading Committee. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005; 29(9): 1228-42
[13].Mildred B, Martens Jeremy H. Keller.routine immunohistochemical staining for high-molecular weight cytokeratin 34-β and α-methylacyl CoA racemase (P504S) in postirradiation prostate biopsies. Modern Pathology. 2006; 19: 287-290. doi:10.1038/modpathol.3800531.
[14].Beach R, Gown AM, de Peralta-Venturina MN, et al. P504S immunohistochemical detection in 405 prostatic specimens including 376 18-gauge needle biopsies. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002; 26: 1588-1596.
[15].Enciu M, Aşchie M, Boşoteanu M, Chisoi A, Rom J. Embryol M. Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the prostate mimicking adenocarcinoma lesion: case report and literature review. 2012; 53(4): 1093-6.
[16].Humphrey PA. Gleason grading and prognostic factors in carcinoma of the prostate. Modern Pathology. 2004; 17(3): 292-306.
[17].Seipel AH, Samaratunga H, Delahunt B, Wiklund F, Wiklund P, Lindberg J, Grönberg H, Egevad L. Immunohistochemical profile of ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Virchows Arch. 2014 Nov; 465(5): 559-65.
[18].Golmohammadi R, Kamalimanesh B. ProtectiveEffect of ascorbicAcid on histology of purkinje neurons of cerebellum in pentylentetrazol-induced epileptic rats. Jmums.mazums. 2015; 25(123): 45-53.
[19].Golmohammadi R, Sabaghzadeh F, Mojadadi MS Effect of hydroalcoholic extract of Anethum graveolens leaves on the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus in the epileptic mice: a histopathological and immunohistochemical study. Res Pharm Sci. 2016 May-Jun; 11(3): 227-32.
[20].Golmohammadi R, Rakhshani MH, Moslem AR, Pejhan A. Prognostic role of PTEN gene expression and length of survival of breast cancer patients in the North East of Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016; 17(S3): 305-9.
[21].Shah RB, Zhou M, LeBlanc M, Snyder M, Rubin MA: Comparison of the basal cell-specific markers, 34betaE12 and p63, in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002; 26(9): 1161-1168.
[22].Oliai BR, Kahane H, Epstein JI: Can basal cells be seen in adenocarcinoma of the prostate? An immunohistochemical study using HMWCK (34βE12) antibody. AM J Surg Pathol. 2002; 26: 1151-1160.
[23].Epstein JI, Egevad L, Humphrey PA, Montironi R. Members of the ISUP Immunohistochemistry in Diagnostic Urologic Pathology Group Best practices recommendations in the application of immunohistochemistry in the prostate: report from the International Society of Urologic Pathology consensus conference. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014 Aug; 38(8): e6-e19.
[24].Montironi R, Scarpelli M, Mazzucchelli R, Lopez-Beltran A, Santoni M, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Cheng L. Does prostate acinar adenocarcinoma with Gleason Score 3+3=6 have the potential to metastasize? Diagnostic Pathology. 2014; 19:190. http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/19/1/190
[25].Kumaresan K, Kakkar N, Verma A, Kumar Mandal A, Kumar Singh Sh, Joshi K. Diagnostic utility of α-methylacyl CoA racemase (P504S) & HMWCK in morphologically difficult prostate cancer. Diagnostic Pathology. 2010; 5: 83. http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/5/1/83.
[26].Seipel AH, Samaratunga H, Delahunt B, Wiklund F, Wiklund P, Lindberg J, Grönberg H, Egevad L. Immunohistochemical profile of ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Virchows Arch. 2014 Nov; 465(5): 559-65..